Vermaatism

 VermaatismBall2.png

, also known as extremely progressive ideology in created by, is heavily influenced by ideologies such as ,  and. This ideology is a recipe for a prosperous future society. With the help of and , it will create a non-chaotic society that develops rapidly. For a successful progressive society, this ideology will certainly deliver. While this ideology makes use of extremist methods of achieving their ideological goals, many would retaliate at the thought of being a factor in my ideology. However this can potential strengthen the human race genetically. Slightly conflicting with ,it's simply another methods of modifying for what I consider to be a inferior species that has massive amounts of aspects that we can improve our species on. I'll talk more on the subject of eugenics combined with transhumanism down below. As well I go in massive detail about my ideological goals and philosophies. But for now, this is adequate for a simple introduction =My Ideological Journey= > >  >  >  >  >  >  >  >  >  >  >  >  >  >  >  >  >  >  >

1: Revolutionising into a technological future
====

1.1/1 The inherently conservative and technologic supressing governance
Living in pre-technological revolutionist society gives conservatism a bigger political platform than a prosperous society would be able to allowed to function under a revisionist view of technology, encompassing from the medical field to a biological one, modifying our systematic processes from a humanist to a post-humanist system, this will provide great efficiency. Having eliminated all humanist error and failure will bring our Dutch society into a superior state in contrast to the largely conservative outer shell. The technological transition will require great effort and strides in order to transition to an Artifistic state and society. Being controlled and edited with robotics, allowing ourselves to be modified. The futuristic society will eliminate all primitivists and conservative thought. Political though will also be rationalised around and basing our thought in scientific principles and adopting a combination of scientocracy and cybertocracy. No policies should be based around conservative principles, only futuristic thought should be allowed into our decision making process. We have witnessed a level of incompetence around the discussion of principles and its relation to politics, however politicians have a lack of knowledge regarding the decision making strategy applied to scientific applicable methodology, this only supresses the populace and the overall progression every societal aspects in regard to technology and cybernetic enhancements of the human body.

Prime examples of these societies are depicted into multiple cultural movies or subjective dystopian works of fiction, calling technology the evils of society is far fetched and outraging. We are ever connected by technology to a small but certainly noticeable degree, denying yourself the luxury and the simplism of incorporating technology in society for the individual is denying comfort and societal culture. All processes will and should be replaced using artificial intelligence and post-humanistic entities for efficiency and uniformity throughout the future. There is a general wish for human imperfections to be eradicated for the human gene-pool, Accomplishing such a large feat requires a strong authoritative figure to guide them towards these idealistic thoughts. The technological norm shifts towards renewed and sustainable methods of producing energy to fuel the newer and modern methods and systematic changes to our overall technological system. Methods including: 'Fusion energy', 'Nuclear energy', 'Solar energy' are all methods that will allow for CO2 neutral Noteworthy works in this category is games like: 'Cyberpunk 2077' & 'Battlefield 2042'. "Technology will thrive and be a successor to human failure." ==== Our moderate government bodies only let them regulate on a humanistic level which allows for a greater room for human error and general failures. Policies that are grounded in conservatism and deaccelerationism will only result in the human psyche connect technology and a cybernetic government to a threat to our individual liberty. With our current government structures being too moderate makes our individual right to choose whether or not to adopt superior changes to our pre-modernist government. The branches of security responsible to uphold social order and lawful nature will be replaced cybernetically enhanced human beings, also being noted as 'Homo-Moderni' equipped with intellectual superiority that borders on genius level intellect the average intelligence relating to security will be fanatically enhanced. In order for the common cliché 'less is more' to be partially applicable, technology should be incorporated to acquire superhuman strength as this is one of the common qualities of military and police personnel, traits that are praised upon in these branches of security should be enhanced dramatically to uphold social and individual security.

The issue of social-surveillance being to outdated in order provide efficiency to an otherwise idealistic system, to adopt facial recognition as a preventive measure against the currently rising crime rate. Most liberals and libertarians would revolt to this so called breach of their own privacy even though they occupy public space, privacy is only a valuable concern if the safety of the individual can guaranteed, the counter-terrorist measures are only for the safety of our own citizens who all sadly occupy the liberal mindset. Adopting facial recognition should be a hybridised system of surveillance and the use of deep learning and building a database of possible criminals, criminals and suspected terrorist within our borders. Using Google's DeepMind AI is a self learning AI that will be beneficial if we are going to adopt security measures in our society. Individual privacy has no intrinsic value of its own, safety always goes above liberty, with no ideological exceptions. While most liberals and anarchists argue that the state is an immoral hierarchy within our current society where no anarchic society has any realistic aspect to their ideological goals. They argue that the individual has a need and the capacity to defend themselves, however those claims are mostly made by ideological groups with negative experiences in connection with the police and state, & the group where they never needed emergency services specific towards the police, I highly value the movement Blue Lives Matter, simply because if they appear to be competent, safety can be assured and rebelliousness will have no role in here.

2.1 Why it's essential for modern society
Worldwide our accomplishment has been made realistic due to objectivism and the extensive use of the hard sciences, without these essentials we still would have been a primitive society where the lifespan wouldn't exceed the 40's. Here by science has made it possible for creating a safer and more importantly a more objective society, however there is a mistrust between society and the individuals involves in the practices of modern day science in the form of hard-skepticism. In a Scientocractic society, skepticism should be eliminated rapidly. Most Skepticists are classified as conservative and therefore I heavily discourage men from following the conservative train of thought. This is also know as  Deaccelerationism, which is synonymous with conservatism and  Primitivism, with the prime example all having the needs to return to a more primitive society, but in different gradations. As society progresses we would heavily be reliant on the sciences to progress. With the use of gene editing (Cas9) we are able to alter our genetic code in the form of DNA. We have a finite number of human aspects that can be improved upon, the extending of life span by making human cells degrade a lot slower, which in return would make our lifespan greater than now, which our average is 81,9 years. Focussing on the healthcare it is continuously improved upon by the curious minds that work in hard sciences themselves, discovering human anatomy, using hyper-modernistic technologies. It has been made possible to fight off different types of cancer, however this technique isn't widely used, despite it has numerous advantages. The limitations of the law has been affecting the sciences for gigantic period of time, due to like I mentioned before, the skepticism. In multiple countries gene-editing (Cas9) has been forbidden by irrational fears and having a conservative government, it is all disadvantaegous towards all individuals who live under such corrupt governments, science is our only way of making a superior species and improving humanity itself. If we truly want to proceed, skepticism should be eliminated and objectivism should be instated in all decision making.

2.2 How it will shape our societal future
Scientocracy isn't as popularized as it should be, it should be instated in favour of mankind, making us healthier, stronger and ultimately prosper. However the government as I currently observe its state, decision making on subjects they have superficial knowledge about is still all too common, even in progressive governments. Instigating wrongful decision making that ultimately our society isn't at its optimal for this day and age. Scientist and the scientific method is only applied partially and not fully, to truly have a sostocratic society, which means only the most effective measures are made, now who makes the best decisions, it is the ones who are competent in what they have studied to do, for years. Accelerationism is the key for the prosperity in a capitalistic environment, more resources allocated for the development of technology and the progression of the hard sciences. Having competent make the decisions instead of conservative politicians who only want deaccelerate society into its previous primitive state. Reactionaries & Decelerationists, ruining it for our future idealistic society. However, all political decision making strategies right up until now has been proven effective for moderate progressivism or reformism, but the whole systematic processes of a democratic state is inevitable in modern day society. Scientocracy calls for an approach that will eliminate democracy as follows, political parties are of no use in a scientocratic state and therefore will be eliminated, a large collective will be formed with the science at its core for policy making, therefore authoritarianism is a wishful replacement for such a society. Free speech to certain degree will be kept, but oppositions specific towards conservatism, will be strongly opposed. In the favour of keeping the liberty, favouring those who are competent in their respective fields should have the dominance to make the decisions they are qualified for, this having strict requirements in order for to be classified as competent.

The decision making progress would require some elements of voting system in order for scientocracy to work effectively but should be minimised to those who have a minimum of a masters degree from a prestigious and elite universities, even being required to take an exam that evaluates both theoretical and practical knowledge. After this would wildly influence our societal future in ways, that human beings through genetecism en eugenicism can create a superior species, eliminating undesirable traits, mostly focussed on genetical disorders and bodily attributes that would differ from the anatomically correct humans. However the current lifespan of a single human being in a first-world country is around 81,9 years, with the means of genetical engineering as mentioned in '2.1' we could make a ginormous difference in our live spans, and this not limited to first-world countries. Ideally a human life span should be around 140-160 years old. Our way of accomplishing this is finding a means for human body cells to degrade slower than previously. Combining both research in main causes of death besides natural causes e.g: Cancer, neuro-degenarive diseases or disorders, STD's & bodily disfunctioning disorders.

2.3 Why we should adopt this type of government
Having witnessed and read up to multiple types of governing bodies and structures, the main difference being the one to hold authority, technocracy is also a governing structure that has similarities to scientocracy, the latter being more authoritative and more progressive than the previous. A idealistic scenario is that the decisions should be based around efficiency which is only possible from those who are knowledgeable. Whenever knowledge leads decision, effectiveness is immediately apparent, even though the system isn't widely adopted, the theoretical bases is already proof enough of its efficiency. Wanting to combine Sostocracy and Scientocracy, society will thrive.

2: Revision of the economic standards of Capitalism'

 * -|The Objectivised Ideology Rating System (TOIRS)=

== ======== ''



+0   +1    +2    +4    +8    +10    +12'+12    +10    +8    +6    +4    +2    +0  '



+10   +12    +8    +6    +4    +2    +0'+0    +2    +4    +6    +8    +10    +12  '



+0   +2    +4    +6    +8    +10    +12+0    +2    +4    +6    +8    +10    +12  ~~

~~

~+0   +2    +4    +6    +8    +12    +10~

''
 * -|TOIRS Template=



+x   +x    +x    +x    +x    +x    +x+x    +x    +x    +x    +x    +x    +x ''



+x   +x    +x    +x    +x    +x    +x+x    +x    +x    +x    +x    +x   +x ''



+x   +x    +x    +x    +x    +x    +x+x    +x    +x    +x    +x   +x    +x ~~

~~

~+x   +x    +x    +x    +x    +x    +x~


 * -|Self-Insert Relations=

[[File:Moonman.png]]

 * (58) - Definitely a based ideology and one of my closest counter-parts
 * [[File:pixil-frame-0(27).png]] New Model Of Cheesenism (54) - Moderately Traditionalist, but is authoritarian, definitely based

[[File:Did.png]]

 * (42) - Free market capitalism with conservative tendencies.
 * (38) - Propertarian by nature and authoritarian, a really good start.

[[File:Cringeism_Pixel.png]]

 * [[File:Panth.png]] Pantheonism (36) - Ideological mess, nothing else to write about your ideology.

[[File:Egophil.png]]

 * [[File:JoeyFloppa boo.png]] (26) - Popular within the PCBA community, not ideologically.
 * (18) - Intellectually stimulating, and massive intellect in both politics and philosophy, very interesting to read, but ideologically we aren't alligned

[[File:Blackcon.png]]

 * -| Realistic Ideological Connections=

[[File:Blackcon.png]] Axiomatically Opposed (1-14)

 * -| Political Allignments=


 * -| Test Results (Political/Psychometrical)=

=Test Results= ]                 
 * -| Political Tests=

        
 * -| Psychometrical=

== Request for Addition= The Standard template for a request would be using bullet points `*` with you ideology template, not your user template for example: ⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇
 * - Could you add me to your self-insert relations?


 * [[File:pixil-frame-0(27).png]] New Model Of Cheesenism - could you add me to your realation i have added you
 * - I've added you onto the list (10-08-2022)
 * Add me (again)?
 * - I've added you onto the list (12-08-2022)
 * Would you add me to your relations? }
 * - I've added you onto the list (14-08-2022)
 * - Add me?
 * - I've added you onto the list (16-08-2022)
 * [[File:Panth.png]] Pantheonism - Could you add me to your self-insert relations?
 * - I've added you onto the list (20-08-2022)
 * [[File:JoeyFloppa boo.png]] - I added you now add me.
 * - I've added you onto the list (21-08-2022)


 * -| Ideology opinions and / or criticism=
 * - Interesting. I must say I take an interest or at least like your fervent desire for acceleration…but you have a very utopian mindset on the situation.
 * - You are like a brother figure ideology